Mobile Bytes #5: Understanding Partition-based Sync and Flexible Sync

[henna.s (Henna Singh)]

There are some interesting question and answers on Flexible Sync that hopefully will be helpful to you all.

@Reveel

• Am I correct, in my assumption that eventually (i.e., once out of preview) Flexible Sync can be ran with Partition-Based Sync in the same Realm App?
• Do you have a GA date estimate? - or even when we can test with both Partition Sync & Flexible Sync in same Realm App.
• Will the limit of 10 Queryable Fields be changeable in future (or handled by a cost factor)? -to avoid using generic names like ‘queryField01’ across classes.
• Will the embedded object or current operators in RQL Limitations for Flexible Sync change by GA or soon after? -If so, can you disclose which are likely?
• With ‘superseded’ is there a suggested wait time to handle before acquiring query state again (assuming connected and all)?
• Out of curiosity, if a query is duplicated in a SubscriptionSet, which will prevail first or last written?

Thank you @Reveel for asking these great questions Linking them here for others as well

Cheers,