Transaction blog-post mistakes - in Node.js

I’m trying to implement the solution described here, in Node.js typescript.

There are 2 things that I would like to have clarified:

  1. In the example await session.endSession(); is used, but according to the typings on my machine, endSession() does not return a promise?
  2. The example saves the result of the withTransaction to a variable called transactionResults . But according to my types, withTransaction is void, i.e. does not return anything?
  3. If an error is thrown inside withTransaction, will the catch(e) block not catch it? Reason I ask this question is because according to the example, there is a if block on the variable transactionResults, where it’s concluded that the transaction was intentionally aborted?

Thanks so much if you can help explain the above, and then we can maybe talk about fixing the types :sweat_smile:

I inserted a refrence screenshot here:

Hi @Lauren_Schaefer - sorry for using the mention feature - but would love your answers on the above questions :blush:

Hey Alex,

Happy to hear you’re trying out the tutorial, but it’s a bummer it’s not working for you! I don’t know Typescript, so, unfortunately, I can’t personally offer much help there. Let me reach out to the Node drivers team, and see if we can get some answers on your first two questions.

Here are the docs for endSession:

Here are the docs for withTransaction:

For question 3 - Let me see if I can describe it in a different way:

    if (transactionResults) {
        console.log("The reservation was successfully created.");
        // This code will be reached if the transaction succeeded
    } else {
        console.log("The transaction was intentionally aborted.");
        // This code will be reached if session.abortTransaction() was called in the transaction
} catch (e) {
    console.log("The transaction was aborted due to an unexpected error: " + e);
    // This code will be reached if something besides an intentional session.abortTransaction() causes the transaction to be aborted
1 Like

Ok, it might be a typings issue, because according to typescript withTransaction is void :flushed:. I actually found this commit in the types repo, where there seems to be a types fix for both the return value and await (question 1 + 2).

Thanks for explaining question 3. So if we do throw new Errror('I was aborted') on the else case in your reply --> all errors will then be handled in the catch?

This is pretty important to me, because when we utilize transactions, I’m mostly interested in knowing if it suceeded or not :face_with_monocle:

Yes, if you throw an Error in the else { }, the catch() { } will catch it. So then any transaction that was intentionally aborted using abortTransaction() or aborted due to an unexpected error will be caught by the catch() {}.


Hi Alex,

Thanks for taking a close look at our transaction tutorial. I see there’s a bit of confusion between the community types and our actual functionality. Luckily the examples from the article are accurate as Lauren has clarified withTransaction returns a command result if the transaction was successful and returns nothing or undefined if the transaction was intentionally aborted.

I’ve created a ticket for us (NODE-3278) to clarify the return types and add some more descriptive notes to these transaction functions in our documentation.

Something to look forward to is our next major release, coming soon, is written in Typescript and we hope that it will offer high quality and accurate type information. It’s not yet production ready yet but you can check out the beta here if that is of interest.


Hi @neal.

I can’t emphasize how important the change to typescript is. We are using a bunch of libraries in our application, and it’s always a big relief when typings are officially supported. It’s the first entry-point of documentation :sunglasses:

Thanks for sharing the links, and our team is looking very much forward to the release written in Typescript with accurate type information :clap: