I just read the Alter Sync Configuration link and it doesn’t say anything about converting from one type to another?
Are there any differences in performance between the two? I know that the legacy query based sync was removed because of performance. Is this resolved with partition based?
In my case. The main use case is that each user has their own data. This maps well to partitions. But there might be future use cases where users might want to share data with each other. What I don’t want to run into is that I start with one, and then discover that I have the need for another sync type and can’t change it if that makes sense.
On one hand, flexible sync sounds like it has pretty high complexity to me and I prefer to keep things simple. On the other hand, Client Reset is only mentioned in the partition based sync. This was a major headache for me when trying to use the legacy realm sync and I found it pretty much impossible to test during development. Is client reset not a thing with flexible sync?