Consistent Reads

User A queries a document. User B also query the same document. User A writes to document and commit. Now User B is left with a document JSON that has already been changed by user A. What happens if user B tries to write and save. Does User A transaction will be lost in that case ?

Hi @waseem_shahzad welcome to the community!

I believe you’re talking about multi-document transaction, but correct me if I’m wrong.

So as I understand it, the scenario is as follows:

  1. A starts a transaction, B also starts a transaction
  2. A writes to a document and commit
  3. B tries to write to the same document and commit

If this is correct, then B would see a write conflict error (see In-progress Transactions and Write Conflicts) which I think describes this exact scenario.

Additionally:

  • If A & B tries to write to different documents, both will succeed and there won’t be errors .
  • If A & B tries to write to different documents, but B relies on something that A previously write (and thus may make the wrong decision), this is a stale read scenario. Please see In-progress Transactions and Stale Reads for more information on how to mitigate this.

Further to your question:

Does User A transaction will be lost in that case

Once a transaction is committed and the client received an acknowledgment, the writes won’t be lost.

Best regards
Kevin

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 5 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.